

The “lap sleeve” also known as the “VSG” or laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy is a relatively new procedure. The procedure was originally intended for a two step procedure in patients that were so obese that conventional procedures such as the bypass and duodenal switch were too risky. The initial results for these type of patients were quite promising in the initial phase and led investigators to wonder what the results of this procedure would be in patients who were not as obese.
The procedure involves resecting or removing approximately 80% of the stomach. This is accomplished by using a surgical stapler and a sizing tube which leaves the stomach as the shape of a slender banana. The procedure works by primarily providing restriction. The advantage of this procedure is that the restriction is not as dramatic as seen in the lap band or the gastric bypass. In addition, some of the pioneers in this procedure believe that there are some metabolic advantages with the lap sleeve. These thoughts are based on significantly improved control of diabetes and hypertension without a proportionally significant amount of weight loss.
The perceived advantages over the lap band include:
The perceived advantages over the gastric bypass include:
The chart below compares the sleeve with the gastric bypass and the lap band.
| Lap Sleeve | Gastric Bypass | Lap Band | |
| Expected weight-loss at 3 years | 60-70% | 70-80% | 50-60% |
| Need for foreign body | None | None | Yes, band and port |
| Need for adjustments | No | No | Yes |
| Stomach size after surgery | 200-300 cc | 30-60 cc | 30-60 cc |
| Number of years studied | <5 years | >25 years | <10 years in the USA |
| Reversibility | Never | Somewhat | Yes |
| Cost | $13,500 to $18,000 | $18,500-$25,000 | $12,000 to $13,500 |
| Insurance Coverage | Rare | Routine | Routine |
| Hunger Suppression | Chemically | Chemically | Mechanically |
| Metabolic Benefit | Some | Significant | None |
| Risk of leak | <5% | <2% | <1% |

The risks of sleeve gastrectomy include: